Much misunderstanding about the
Christian life occurs because we either assign commands and exhortations we
should be following as "era-specific" commands that only applied to
the original audience, or we take commands and exhortations that are specific
to a particular audience and make them timeless truths. How do we go about
discerning the difference? The first thing to note is that the canon of
Scripture was closed by the end of the 1st century A.D. This means that, while
all of the Bible is truth we can apply to our lives, most, if not all, of the
Bible was not originally written to us. The authors had in mind the hearers of
that day. That should cause us to be very careful when interpreting the Bible
for today’s Christians. It seems that much of contemporary evangelical
preaching is so concerned with the practical application of Scripture that we
treat the Bible as a lake from which to fish application for today’s
Christians. All of this is done at the expense of proper exegesis and
interpretation.
The top three rules of
hermeneutics (the art and science of biblical interpretation) are 1) context;
2) context; 3) context. Before we can tell 21st-century Christians how the
Bible applies to them, we must first come to the best possible understanding of
what the Bible meant to its original audience. If we come up with an
application that would have been foreign to the original audience, there is a
very strong possibility that we did not interpret the passage correctly. Once
we are confident that we understand what the text meant to its original
hearers, we then need to determine the width of the chasm between us and them.
In other words, what are the differences in language, time, culture, geography,
setting and situation? All of these must be taken into account before
application can be made. Once the width of the chasm has been measured, we can
then attempt to build the bridge over the chasm by finding the commonalities
between the original audience and ourselves. Finally, we can then find
application for ourselves in our time and situation.
Another important thing to note
is that each passage has only one correct interpretation. It can have a range
of application, but only one interpretation. What this means is that some
applications of biblical passages are better than others. If one application is
closer to the correct interpretation than another, then it is a better
application of that text. For example, many sermons have been preached on 1
Samuel 17 (the David and Goliath story) that center on "defeating the
giants in your life." They lightly skim over the details of the narrative
and go straight to application, and that application usually involves
allegorizing Goliath into tough, difficult and intimidating situations in one’s
life that must be overcome by faith. There is also an attempt to allegorize the
five smooth stones David picked up to defeat his giant. These sermons usually
conclude by exhorting us to be faithful like David.
While these interpretations make
engaging sermons, it is doubtful the original audience would have gotten that
message from this story. Before we can apply the truth in 1 Samuel 17, we must
know how the original audience understood it, and that means determining the
overall purpose of 1 Samuel as a book. Without going into a detailed exegesis
of 1 Samuel 17, let’s just say it’s not about defeating the giants in your life
with faith. That may be a distant application, but as an interpretation of the
passage, it’s alien to the text. God is the hero of the story, and David was
His chosen vehicle to bring salvation to His people. The story contrasts the
people’s king (Saul) with God’s king (David), and it also foreshadows what
Christ (the Son of David) would do for us in providing our salvation.
Another common example of interpreting
with disregard of the context is John 14:13-14. Reading this verse out of
context would seem to indicate that if we ask God anything (unqualified), we
will receive it as long as we use the formula “in Jesus’ name.” Applying the
rules of proper hermeneutics to this passage, we see Jesus speaking to His
disciples in the upper room on the night of His eventual betrayal. The
immediate audience is the disciples. This is essentially a promise to His
disciples that God will provide the necessary resources for them to complete
their task. It is a passage of comfort because Jesus would soon be leaving
them. Is there an application for 21st-century Christians? Of course! If we
pray in Jesus’ name, we pray according to God’s will and God will give us what
we need to accomplish His will in and through us. Furthermore, the response we
get will always glorify God. Far from a "carte blanche" way of
getting what we want, this passage teaches us that we must always submit to
God’s will in prayer, and that God will always provide what we need to
accomplish His will.
Proper biblical interpretation is built on the following principles:
1. Context. To understand fully,
start small and extend outward: verse, passage, chapter, book, author and
testament/covenant.
2. Try to come to grips with how
the original audience would have understood the text.
3. Consider the width of the
chasm between us and the original audience.
4. It’s a safe bet that any moral
command from the Old Testament that is repeated in the New Testament is an
example of a "timeless truth."
5. Remember that each passage has
one and only one correct interpretation, but can have many applications (some
better than others).
6. Always be humble and don’t
forget the role of the Holy Spirit in interpretation. He has promised to lead us
into all truth (John 16:13).
Biblical interpretation is as
much an art as it is science. There are rules and principles, but some of the
more difficult or controversial passages require more effort than others. We
should always be open to changing an interpretation if the Spirit convicts and
the evidence supports.
No comments:
Post a Comment